Review of FIGHT
by Johny McFliggen, PhD Literature & Business, Oxford
"FIGHT" by Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes is a heavyweight bout in the ring of political literature, albeit not without its moments of shadowboxing. The authors, well-seasoned in the art of political reportage, attempt to craft a narrative around the 2020 U.S. presidential election that is both expansive and incisive. What we get is a mixed bag, rather like a season of "House of Cards" that occasionally lacks the Machiavellian intrigue we've come to expect.
Allen and Parnes bring their journalistic chops to the fore, constructing a narrative through an impressive array of interviews and thorough research. They peel back the curtains on the campaign strategies, media machinations, and social movements that influenced the electoral process. Their account is replete with the hustle and bustle of a campaign trail where every handshake and soundbite seems to carry the weight of the world. Yet, one cannot shake the feeling that much of this territory has been traversed before, perhaps more deftly by the likes of Bob Woodward or in the more cinematic flair of John Heilemann's "Game Change."
The book attempts to capture the zeitgeist of an election defined as much by its candidates as by its chaotic socio-political backdrop. However, it sometimes reads like a series of déjà vus strung together with journalistic precision but lacking that elusive new insight which might have elevated it beyond competent reportage. Yes, there are moments where the narrative grips you like a good episode of "The West Wing," but these are interspersed with sections that feel like they are dutifully recounting events rather than offering fresh perspectives.
Critics have been divided, which is par for the course with political literature. Some hail "FIGHT" for its comprehensive coverage and engaging narrative—a testament to Allen and Parnes' ability to synthesize complex political dynamics into digestible prose. Others, however, have pointed to a certain lack of originality, suggesting that the book merely repackages known events without significant new revelations.
In drawing comparisons, one might say "FIGHT" is akin to a political documentary produced in high definition—crystal clear but occasionally lacking surprise plot twists. It stands alongside works like Woodward's "Rage," offering a granular exploration of pivotal moments, but it doesn't quite match the gripping pace or revelatory punch.
Ultimately, "FIGHT" is an important contribution to the genre of political reportage. It holds a mirror to the American electoral process, reflecting both its grandeur and its flaws. While it may not deliver groundbreaking revelations, it provides a detailed snapshot of an election that will be dissected for years to come. For those keen on political minutiae and behind-the-scenes drama, this book offers a ringside seat. Just don't expect it to reinvent the political narrative wheel.
Purchase Link: FIGHT on Amazon
